The Art of Losing
"One Art" is a beautiful villanelle in which Elizabeth Bishop claims, "The art is losing isn't hard to master".
However, we do not agree with her because material things are never
lost, real losses are eternal and the poetess herself fails to master
this so-called art.
Firstly, material things are never
lost but misplaced. Door keys, watches and houses etc are not lost
because they retain their existence. They have chances of retrieval. We
may run into them any time. If they mislaid permanently, we can get
their substitutes. Thus tangible things are never lost.
Secondly, the real losses are the
losses of those things that lose their existence. The death of our dear
ones is an example of these losses. Time can assuage the pain of loss
but can never return us a lost mother, father or friend. Hence it is
impossible to master the art of losing.
Thirdly, the poetess herself fails
to master this art. The rhythm of the poem is choked up. There are many
glottal pauses, signifying that the poetess is trying to hold back the
tears and having trouble controlling her view point. So how can we agree
with her flippancy!